No. 04-108
E579569
No. 04-108 is the docket number for the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London, which addressed the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| No. 04-108 canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T6250589 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: No. 04-108 Context triple: [Kelo v. City of New London, hasDocketNumber, No. 04-108]
-
A.
De Canas v. Bica
De Canas v. Bica is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a California law regulating the employment of unauthorized immigrants, holding that not all state regulations touching on immigration are preempted by federal law.
-
B.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
C.
Yamashita v. Styer
Yamashita v. Styer is a landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita and established the controversial "command responsibility" doctrine in international law.
-
D.
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
-
E.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: No. 04-108 Target entity description: No. 04-108 is the docket number for the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London, which addressed the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
-
A.
De Canas v. Bica
De Canas v. Bica is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a California law regulating the employment of unauthorized immigrants, holding that not all state regulations touching on immigration are preempted by federal law.
-
B.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
C.
Yamashita v. Styer
Yamashita v. Styer is a landmark 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita and established the controversial "command responsibility" doctrine in international law.
-
D.
Romer v. Evans
Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
-
E.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (42)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf | U.S. Supreme Court docket number ⓘ |
| appliedToStatesThrough |
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
ⓘ
linked to:
Fourteenth Amendment
|
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
land use law ⓘ property law ⓘ |
| arguedDate | February 22, 2005 ⓘ |
| caseStatus | decided ⓘ |
| caseType | civil case ⓘ |
| citation | 545 U.S. 469 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted | Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | June 23, 2005 ⓘ |
| dissentingOpinionBy |
Justice Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
linked to:
Antonin Scalia
Justice Clarence Thomas ⓘ
linked to:
Clarence Thomas
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ
linked to:
Sandra Day O’Connor
Justice William Rehnquist ⓘ
linked to:
William H. Rehnquist
|
| holding | The government may take private property and transfer it to another private party as part of a comprehensive economic development plan without violating the public use requirement of the Fifth Amendment ⓘ |
| impact |
Led many U.S. states to enact legislation restricting economic development takings
ⓘ
Prompted widespread public controversy over eminent domain ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
Justice Anthony Kennedy
ⓘ
linked to:
Anthony M. Kennedy
Justice David Souter ⓘ
linked to:
David H. Souter
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
linked to:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Justice Stephen Breyer ⓘ
linked to:
Stephen G. Breyer
|
| jurisdiction |
United States federal judiciary
ⓘ
linked to:
federal judiciary of the United States
|
| languageOfProceedings | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment
ⓘ
economic development takings ⓘ eminent domain ⓘ public use requirement ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Justice John Paul Stevens
ⓘ
linked to:
John Paul Stevens
|
| originatingCity | New London, Connecticut ⓘ |
| originatingState | Connecticut ⓘ |
| petitioner |
Other property owners in New London, Connecticut
ⓘ
Susette Kelo ⓘ |
| refersToCase | Kelo v. City of New London ⓘ |
| relatedConcept |
economic revitalization projects
ⓘ
urban redevelopment ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine | public purpose doctrine ⓘ |
| respondent |
City of New London, Connecticut
ⓘ
linked to:
City of New London
|
| termOfCourt | October Term 2004 ⓘ |
| voteSplit | 5-4 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: No. 04-108 Description of subject: No. 04-108 is the docket number for the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London, which addressed the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.