garbage can model of organizational choice
E446937
The garbage can model of organizational choice is a theory in organizational studies that portrays decision-making in complex organizations as a chaotic process where problems, solutions, participants, and opportunities flow independently and are only loosely coupled.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| garbage can model of organizational choice canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T4489035 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: garbage can model of organizational choice Context triple: [James G. March, knownFor, garbage can model of organizational choice]
-
A.
Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It
"Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It" is a seminal public administration and political science book by James Q. Wilson that analyzes how and why government agencies operate as they do.
-
B.
Models of Bounded Rationality
Models of Bounded Rationality is a collection of Herbert A. Simon’s influential works that develop the concept of bounded rationality, explaining how real-world decision-making is constrained by limited information, cognitive capacity, and time.
-
C.
Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes (1973)
"Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes" (1973) is a seminal paper by Lotfi A. Zadeh that introduced the concept of fuzzy logic as a framework for modeling and reasoning about complex, uncertain systems and human decision-making.
-
D.
Governing the Commons
Governing the Commons is a seminal book by political economist Elinor Ostrom that analyzes how communities successfully manage shared resources without relying solely on privatization or government control.
-
E.
Collective Choice and Social Welfare
Collective Choice and Social Welfare is a foundational work in social choice theory that rigorously examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions while addressing issues of welfare, justice, and fairness.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: garbage can model of organizational choice Target entity description: The garbage can model of organizational choice is a theory in organizational studies that portrays decision-making in complex organizations as a chaotic process where problems, solutions, participants, and opportunities flow independently and are only loosely coupled.
-
A.
Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It
"Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It" is a seminal public administration and political science book by James Q. Wilson that analyzes how and why government agencies operate as they do.
-
B.
Models of Bounded Rationality
Models of Bounded Rationality is a collection of Herbert A. Simon’s influential works that develop the concept of bounded rationality, explaining how real-world decision-making is constrained by limited information, cognitive capacity, and time.
-
C.
Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes (1973)
"Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes" (1973) is a seminal paper by Lotfi A. Zadeh that introduced the concept of fuzzy logic as a framework for modeling and reasoning about complex, uncertain systems and human decision-making.
-
D.
Governing the Commons
Governing the Commons is a seminal book by political economist Elinor Ostrom that analyzes how communities successfully manage shared resources without relying solely on privatization or government control.
-
E.
Collective Choice and Social Welfare
Collective Choice and Social Welfare is a foundational work in social choice theory that rigorously examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions while addressing issues of welfare, justice, and fairness.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
decision-making model
ⓘ
organizational theory ⓘ theory of organizational choice ⓘ |
| acknowledges |
importance of chance in decision outcomes
ⓘ
limited attention of participants ⓘ shifting involvement of participants over time ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
loosely structured organizations
ⓘ
public organizations ⓘ universities ⓘ |
| associatedWithConcept | organized anarchies ⓘ |
| assumes | independent streams of problems, solutions, participants, and opportunities ⓘ |
| characterizesDecisionMakingAs | chaotic process ⓘ |
| contrastsWith | rational decision-making models ⓘ |
| critiques |
assumption of fully informed decision makers
ⓘ
assumption of stable organizational preferences ⓘ |
| describes | decision-making in complex organizations ⓘ |
| emphasizes | loose coupling of organizational elements ⓘ |
| explains | how decisions can result from random conjunctions of streams ⓘ |
| field |
management studies
ⓘ
organizational studies ⓘ political science ⓘ public administration ⓘ |
| focusesOn | temporal order of events in decision processes ⓘ |
| highlights |
ambiguity in organizational goals
ⓘ
fluid participation of decision makers ⓘ unclear technology in organizations ⓘ |
| implies | decisions can be artifacts of timing rather than preference optimization ⓘ |
| includesElement |
choice opportunities
ⓘ
participants ⓘ problems ⓘ solutions ⓘ |
| influenced | multiple streams framework in public policy NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| involves | coupling of problems and solutions at choice opportunities ⓘ |
| originatedIn | 1970s ⓘ |
| proposes | decision outcomes depend on timing of stream intersections ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
bounded rationality
ⓘ
contingency theories of organizations ⓘ institutional theories of organizations ⓘ |
| suggests |
decisions may occur without solving problems
ⓘ
problems may not be solved but may move from one choice opportunity to another ⓘ problems may persist without decisions ⓘ solutions can exist before problems ⓘ |
| usedAs | metaphor for messy organizational decision processes ⓘ |
| usedToAnalyze |
agenda setting in organizations
ⓘ
organizational decision outcomes ⓘ policy formation processes ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: garbage can model of organizational choice Description of subject: The garbage can model of organizational choice is a theory in organizational studies that portrays decision-making in complex organizations as a chaotic process where problems, solutions, participants, and opportunities flow independently and are only loosely coupled.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.