Apology of Eunomius

E430902

Apology of Eunomius is a theological treatise by the 4th-century Arian bishop Eunomius of Cyzicus, in which he systematically defends his radical subordinationist views on the nature of the Son and the simplicity of God.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Apology of Eunomius canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (45)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Christian theological work
theological treatise
associatedPerson Eunomius of Cyzicus
associatedWith Anomoean party
author Eunomius of Cyzicus
centuryOfComposition 4th century
controversialFor extreme rationalism about divine essence
rejection of Nicene orthodoxy
criticizedBy Basil of Caesarea
Gregory of Nyssa
defends Anomoean understanding of the Son
Eunomian doctrine of God
doctrinalPosition denial of the Son’s consubstantiality with the Father
radical subordinationism
ecclesiasticalContext Eastern Roman Empire
linked to: Byzantine Empire
field Trinitarian theology
patristic theology
genre dogmatic treatise
polemical work
hasResponseAuthor Basil of Caesarea
Gregory of Nyssa
hasResponseWork Against Eunomius
historicalContext post-Nicene Arian controversy
historicalPeriod Late Antiquity
influenced later Eunomian writers
influencedBy Aetius of Antioch
language Ancient Greek
mainTopic nature of the Son
simplicity of God
subordination of the Son to the Father
opposesDoctrine Nicene homoousios
linked to: Homoousian theology

consubstantiality of Father and Son
preservedIn patristic manuscript tradition
religiousTradition Christianity
studiedIn historical theology
patristics
supportsView God’s essence is fully knowable by human reason
God’s essence is identical with being unbegotten
the Father alone is true God in the highest sense
the Son is a created being
theologicalOrientation Arianism
Eunomianism
usesMethod biblical proof-texting
philosophical reasoning
systematic argumentation

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Against Eunomius refutesWorkOf Apology of Eunomius