United States v. Stanley
E399562
United States v. Stanley is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that formed part of the Civil Rights Cases, in which the Court limited federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals and businesses.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States v. Stanley canonical | 4 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T3932007 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Stanley Context triple: [The Civil Rights Cases, hasPart, United States v. Stanley]
-
A.
United States v. Comstock
United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
-
B.
United States v. Classic
United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
-
C.
United States v. Giordano
United States v. Giordano is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the strict procedural requirements for federal wiretap authorizations and limited who may approve such surveillance orders.
-
D.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
E.
Dennis v. United States
Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Stanley Target entity description: United States v. Stanley is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that formed part of the Civil Rights Cases, in which the Court limited federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals and businesses.
-
A.
United States v. Comstock
United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
-
B.
United States v. Classic
United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
-
C.
United States v. Giordano
United States v. Giordano is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the strict procedural requirements for federal wiretap authorizations and limited who may approve such surveillance orders.
-
D.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
E.
Dennis v. United States
Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (33)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf | United States Supreme Court case ⓘ |
| appliesToJurisdiction | federal law of the United States ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
civil rights law
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ |
| citationStatus | good law on the state action doctrine ⓘ |
| countryOfJurisdiction |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionType | consolidated decision ⓘ |
| effect |
contributed to the legal framework that allowed Jim Crow segregation to develop
ⓘ
limited federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private businesses ⓘ limited federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals ⓘ narrowed interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment enforcement power ⓘ |
| holding |
Congress lacks authority under the Fourteenth Amendment to regulate purely private acts of racial discrimination
ⓘ
the Civil Rights Act of 1875 is unconstitutional insofar as it regulates private discrimination in public accommodations ⓘ the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits state action, not private conduct ⓘ the Thirteenth Amendment does not authorize Congress to prohibit all private racial discrimination in public accommodations ⓘ |
| legalDoctrine | state action doctrine ⓘ |
| legalSubject |
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
ⓘ
linked to:
Fourteenth Amendment
Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
linked to:
Thirteenth Amendment
public accommodations ⓘ racial discrimination ⓘ scope of federal power ⓘ |
| overruledBy | Civil Rights Act of 1964 (as a matter of statutory policy rather than formal judicial overruling) ⓘ |
| partOf |
Civil Rights Cases
ⓘ
linked to:
The Civil Rights Cases (1883)
|
| relatedCase |
Civil Rights Cases
ⓘ
linked to:
The Civil Rights Cases (1883)
Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad ⓘ United States v. Nichols ⓘ United States v. Ryan ⓘ United States v. Singleton ⓘ |
| relatedLegislation |
Civil Rights Act of 1875
ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
linked to:
Fourteenth Amendment
Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
linked to:
Thirteenth Amendment
|
| timePeriod | Reconstruction era and post-Reconstruction civil rights jurisprudence ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: United States v. Stanley Description of subject: United States v. Stanley is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that formed part of the Civil Rights Cases, in which the Court limited federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals and businesses.
Referenced by (4)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.