Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
E383001
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Martin v. Hunter's Lessee canonical | 4 |
| Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T3704549 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Martin v. Hunter's Lessee Context triple: [Cohens v. Virginia, precededBy, Martin v. Hunter's Lessee]
-
A.
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
-
B.
Gibbons v. Ogden
Gibbons v. Ogden was an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed federal power over interstate commerce, significantly strengthening national authority relative to the states.
-
C.
Fletcher v. Peck
Fletcher v. Peck was an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that for the first time struck down a state law as unconstitutional, helping define the scope of the Contract Clause and judicial review over state legislation.
-
D.
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott v. Sandford was an 1857 U.S. Supreme Court decision that infamously denied citizenship and constitutional rights to African Americans and helped accelerate tensions leading to the Civil War.
-
E.
Paul v. Virginia
Paul v. Virginia is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held corporations are not “citizens” under the Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause, allowing states to regulate foreign insurance companies.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Martin v. Hunter's Lessee Target entity description: Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
-
A.
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
-
B.
Gibbons v. Ogden
Gibbons v. Ogden was an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed federal power over interstate commerce, significantly strengthening national authority relative to the states.
-
C.
Fletcher v. Peck
Fletcher v. Peck was an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that for the first time struck down a state law as unconstitutional, helping define the scope of the Contract Clause and judicial review over state legislation.
-
D.
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott v. Sandford was an 1857 U.S. Supreme Court decision that infamously denied citizenship and constitutional rights to African Americans and helped accelerate tensions leading to the Civil War.
-
E.
Paul v. Virginia
Paul v. Virginia is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held corporations are not “citizens” under the Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause, allowing states to regulate foreign insurance companies.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
land dispute case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
federal courts ⓘ property law ⓘ |
| authorOfOpinion | Joseph Story ⓘ |
| chiefJusticeAtTime | John Marshall ⓘ |
| citation | 14 U.S. (1 Wheat.) 304 ⓘ |
| consideredLandmarkCaseIn |
United States constitutional law
ⓘ
federal jurisdiction ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Article III of the United States Constitution
ⓘ
Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution ⓘ
linked to:
Supremacy Clause
|
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| dateDecided | 1816-03-20 ⓘ |
| decisionType | appellate decision ⓘ |
| establishes | authority of the U.S. Supreme Court to review state court decisions on federal questions ⓘ |
| holding |
Congress may authorize Supreme Court review of state court judgments in cases arising under federal law
ⓘ
State courts are bound by the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of federal law ⓘ The U.S. Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over state court decisions involving federal law ⓘ |
| involves | conflict between a federal treaty and Virginia land laws ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States federal judiciary
ⓘ
linked to:
federal judiciary of the United States
|
| languageOfProceeding | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
Supremacy Clause application
ⓘ
appellate jurisdiction over state courts ⓘ federal judicial review of state court decisions ⓘ interpretation of Article III of the U.S. Constitution ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Joseph Story ⓘ |
| originatingState | Virginia ⓘ |
| party |
Denny Martin
ⓘ
Hunter's Lessee ⓘ |
| precedentFor |
Supreme Court appellate review of state court judgments in federal question cases
ⓘ
binding nature of Supreme Court decisions on state courts ⓘ |
| proceduralPosture | review of a decision of the Virginia Court of Appeals ⓘ |
| reinforcesPrinciple |
federal judicial supremacy
ⓘ
supremacy of federal law over state law ⓘ uniformity of federal law interpretation ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine |
federalism
ⓘ
judicial review ⓘ vertical stare decisis ⓘ |
| result | Virginia Court of Appeals judgment reversed in part ⓘ |
| stateCourtInvolved |
Virginia Court of Appeals
ⓘ
linked to:
Court of Appeals of Virginia
|
| subjectMatter | title to land in Virginia formerly owned by Lord Fairfax ⓘ |
| treatyInvolved |
Jay Treaty
ⓘ
Treaty of Paris (1783) ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1816 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Martin v. Hunter's Lessee Description of subject: Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
Referenced by (5)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: Martin v. Hunter's Lessee