Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
E247734
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
All labels observed (10)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T2239145 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mabo v Queensland (No 2) Context triple: [Aboriginal Australians, subjectOf, Mabo v Queensland (No 2)]
-
A.
Uluru Statement from the Heart
The Uluru Statement from the Heart is a landmark 2017 declaration by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders calling for a First Nations Voice to Parliament enshrined in the Australian Constitution and a process of truth-telling and agreement-making.
-
B.
Yirrkala bark petitions
The Yirrkala bark petitions are historic 1963 documents created by Yolngu elders on painted bark, recognized as the first traditional Aboriginal artworks used to assert Indigenous land rights in the Australian Parliament.
-
C.
Cummeragunja walk-off
The Cummeragunja walk-off was a landmark 1939 protest in which Yorta Yorta people left the Cummeragunja Mission in New South Wales to resist oppressive government control and demand better living conditions and rights.
-
D.
Crown in right of Papua New Guinea
The Crown in right of Papua New Guinea is the legal embodiment of the state’s authority and sovereignty as vested in the monarch within Papua New Guinea’s constitutional monarchy system.
-
E.
Standard of the Governor of New South Wales
The Standard of the Governor of New South Wales is the official personal flag used to represent the governor’s authority and presence within the Australian state of New South Wales.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mabo v Queensland (No 2) Target entity description: Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
-
A.
Uluru Statement from the Heart
The Uluru Statement from the Heart is a landmark 2017 declaration by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders calling for a First Nations Voice to Parliament enshrined in the Australian Constitution and a process of truth-telling and agreement-making.
-
B.
Yirrkala bark petitions
The Yirrkala bark petitions are historic 1963 documents created by Yolngu elders on painted bark, recognized as the first traditional Aboriginal artworks used to assert Indigenous land rights in the Australian Parliament.
-
C.
Cummeragunja walk-off
The Cummeragunja walk-off was a landmark 1939 protest in which Yorta Yorta people left the Cummeragunja Mission in New South Wales to resist oppressive government control and demand better living conditions and rights.
-
D.
Crown in right of Papua New Guinea
The Crown in right of Papua New Guinea is the legal embodiment of the state’s authority and sovereignty as vested in the monarch within Papua New Guinea’s constitutional monarchy system.
-
E.
Standard of the Governor of New South Wales
The Standard of the Governor of New South Wales is the official personal flag used to represent the governor’s authority and presence within the Australian state of New South Wales.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
High Court of Australia decision
ⓘ
landmark court case ⓘ native title case ⓘ |
| bench |
Daryl Dawson
ⓘ
Gerard Brennan ⓘ John Toohey ⓘ Mary Gaudron ⓘ Michael McHugh ⓘ Sir Anthony Mason ⓘ William Deane ⓘ
linked to:
William Patrick Deane
|
| citation |
(1992) 175 CLR 1
ⓘ
[1992] HCA 23 ⓘ |
| country | Australia ⓘ |
| court | High Court of Australia ⓘ |
| dateDecided | 1992-06-03 ⓘ |
| defendant |
State of Queensland
ⓘ
linked to:
Queensland
|
| dissentingJudges | Dawson ⓘ |
| fullCaseName |
Mabo and Others v State of Queensland
ⓘ
linked to:
Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
|
| geographicalFocus |
Murray Islands, Torres Strait
ⓘ
linked to:
Murray Island
|
| held |
extinguishment of native title must be clear and plain
ⓘ
inconsistency between native title rights and later grants can extinguish native title ⓘ native title can be recognised where a traditional connection with land is maintained ⓘ native title can survive the acquisition of sovereignty ⓘ native title is a sui generis interest in land ⓘ native title is based on traditional laws and customs of Indigenous peoples ⓘ native title is recognised by the common law of Australia ⓘ native title may be extinguished by valid exercise of sovereign power ⓘ the Crown acquired radical title, not beneficial ownership, upon sovereignty ⓘ the Meriam people hold native title rights to the Murray Islands ⓘ the doctrine of terra nullius does not apply to Australia ⓘ |
| impact |
foundation of the Australian native title system
ⓘ
major shift in Australian property law ⓘ recognition of pre-existing Indigenous rights to land ⓘ |
| influenced | recognition of native title across Australia ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | original jurisdiction of the High Court of Australia ⓘ |
| leadingJudgmentBy | Gerard Brennan ⓘ |
| legalArea |
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ native title ⓘ property law ⓘ |
| legalPrinciple |
continuity of Indigenous laws and customs
ⓘ
radical title of the Crown ⓘ requirement of clear and plain intention to extinguish native title ⓘ |
| majorityJudges |
Brennan
ⓘ
Deane ⓘ Gaudron ⓘ Mason ⓘ McHugh ⓘ Toohey ⓘ |
| overturned | the notion that Australia was land belonging to no one at British acquisition ⓘ |
| overturnedDoctrine | terra nullius in relation to Australia ⓘ |
| plaintiff |
David Passi
ⓘ
Eddie Koiki Mabo ⓘ James Rice ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Mabo v Queensland (No 1)
ⓘ
linked to:
Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
Native Title Act 1993 ⓘ
linked to:
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
|
| subjectMatter | land rights of the Meriam people of the Murray Islands ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1992 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Mabo v Queensland (No 2) Description of subject: Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
Referenced by (33)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
subject linked to:
Sir Anthony Mason
subject linked to:
the Meriam people hold native title rights to the Murray Islands
subject linked to:
the Meriam people hold native title rights to the Murray Islands
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
subject linked to:
Toohey
subject linked to:
Toohey
linked to: Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
subject linked to:
Dunghutti People v Commonwealth of Australia (native title case)