Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001)
E1570806
UNEXPLORED
Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing whether Texas’s revised capital sentencing instructions adequately allowed jurors to give effect to mitigating evidence of intellectual disability in a death penalty case.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001) canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T23119548 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001) Context triple: [Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989), relatedCase, Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001)]
-
A.
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989)
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment did not categorically bar the execution of individuals with intellectual disabilities, a stance later reversed by Atkins v. Virginia.
-
B.
Penry v. Lynaugh
Penry v. Lynaugh is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment did not categorically prohibit executing individuals with intellectual disabilities, a stance later reversed in Atkins v. Virginia.
-
C.
Perry v. Brown
Perry v. Brown was a landmark federal appellate case challenging California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage, ultimately paving the way for the restoration of marriage equality in the state.
-
D.
Miller v. Johnson
Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
-
E.
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Perry v. Schwarzenegger was the landmark federal district court case that first struck down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001) Target entity description: Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing whether Texas’s revised capital sentencing instructions adequately allowed jurors to give effect to mitigating evidence of intellectual disability in a death penalty case.
-
A.
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989)
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment did not categorically bar the execution of individuals with intellectual disabilities, a stance later reversed by Atkins v. Virginia.
-
B.
Penry v. Lynaugh
Penry v. Lynaugh is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment did not categorically prohibit executing individuals with intellectual disabilities, a stance later reversed in Atkins v. Virginia.
-
C.
Perry v. Brown
Perry v. Brown was a landmark federal appellate case challenging California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage, ultimately paving the way for the restoration of marriage equality in the state.
-
D.
Miller v. Johnson
Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
-
E.
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Perry v. Schwarzenegger was the landmark federal district court case that first struck down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.