The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees.
E1516253
UNEXPLORED
This entity is a key holding from the U.S. Supreme Court case Arizona v. Evans, clarifying that the exclusionary rule targets deterrence of police misconduct rather than mistakes made by court personnel.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees. canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T22061436 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees. Context triple: [Arizona v. Evans, reasoningSummary, The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees.]
-
A.
Rule 403
Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
-
B.
Police officer conducted an investigatory stop of Strieff without reasonable suspicion.
Utah v. Strieff is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether evidence discovered after an unlawful investigatory stop could be admitted under the attenuation doctrine when an outstanding arrest warrant is found.
-
C.
Supreme Court is not a suitable sole tribunal for impeachments
"Supreme Court is not a suitable sole tribunal for impeachments" is the constitutional argument, articulated in The Federalist No. 65, that impeachment trials should not be entrusted exclusively to the U.S. Supreme Court due to concerns about its composition, role, and potential biases.
-
D.
Criminal Procedure Rule Committee
The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee is a statutory body responsible for making rules that govern the practice and procedure of criminal courts in England and Wales.
-
E.
Supreme Court Criminal Rules
The Supreme Court Criminal Rules are a set of procedural regulations that govern how criminal cases are conducted and managed in the Supreme Court of Tasmania.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees. Target entity description: This entity is a key holding from the U.S. Supreme Court case Arizona v. Evans, clarifying that the exclusionary rule targets deterrence of police misconduct rather than mistakes made by court personnel.
-
A.
Rule 403
Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
-
B.
Police officer conducted an investigatory stop of Strieff without reasonable suspicion.
Utah v. Strieff is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether evidence discovered after an unlawful investigatory stop could be admitted under the attenuation doctrine when an outstanding arrest warrant is found.
-
C.
Supreme Court is not a suitable sole tribunal for impeachments
"Supreme Court is not a suitable sole tribunal for impeachments" is the constitutional argument, articulated in The Federalist No. 65, that impeachment trials should not be entrusted exclusively to the U.S. Supreme Court due to concerns about its composition, role, and potential biases.
-
D.
Criminal Procedure Rule Committee
The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee is a statutory body responsible for making rules that govern the practice and procedure of criminal courts in England and Wales.
-
E.
Supreme Court Criminal Rules
The Supreme Court Criminal Rules are a set of procedural regulations that govern how criminal cases are conducted and managed in the Supreme Court of Tasmania.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Arizona v. Evans
→
reasoningSummary
→
The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees.
ⓘ