Triple
T22061436
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arizona v. Evans |
E545160
|
entity |
| Predicate | reasoningSummary |
P13318
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees. | Statement: [Arizona v. Evans, reasoningSummary, The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees. Context triple: [Arizona v. Evans, reasoningSummary, The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees.]
-
A.
Rule 403
Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
-
B.
Police officer conducted an investigatory stop of Strieff without reasonable suspicion.
Utah v. Strieff is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether evidence discovered after an unlawful investigatory stop could be admitted under the attenuation doctrine when an outstanding arrest warrant is found.
-
C.
Supreme Court is not a suitable sole tribunal for impeachments
"Supreme Court is not a suitable sole tribunal for impeachments" is the constitutional argument, articulated in The Federalist No. 65, that impeachment trials should not be entrusted exclusively to the U.S. Supreme Court due to concerns about its composition, role, and potential biases.
-
D.
Criminal Procedure Rule Committee
The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee is a statutory body responsible for making rules that govern the practice and procedure of criminal courts in England and Wales.
-
E.
Supreme Court Criminal Rules
The Supreme Court Criminal Rules are a set of procedural regulations that govern how criminal cases are conducted and managed in the Supreme Court of Tasmania.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Court emphasized that the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct, not errors by court employees. Target entity description: This entity is a key holding from the U.S. Supreme Court case Arizona v. Evans, clarifying that the exclusionary rule targets deterrence of police misconduct rather than mistakes made by court personnel.
-
A.
Rule 403
Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
-
B.
Police officer conducted an investigatory stop of Strieff without reasonable suspicion.
Utah v. Strieff is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether evidence discovered after an unlawful investigatory stop could be admitted under the attenuation doctrine when an outstanding arrest warrant is found.
-
C.
Supreme Court is not a suitable sole tribunal for impeachments
"Supreme Court is not a suitable sole tribunal for impeachments" is the constitutional argument, articulated in The Federalist No. 65, that impeachment trials should not be entrusted exclusively to the U.S. Supreme Court due to concerns about its composition, role, and potential biases.
-
D.
Criminal Procedure Rule Committee
The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee is a statutory body responsible for making rules that govern the practice and procedure of criminal courts in England and Wales.
-
E.
Supreme Court Criminal Rules
The Supreme Court Criminal Rules are a set of procedural regulations that govern how criminal cases are conducted and managed in the Supreme Court of Tasmania.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3377c48190890c17407b9527d6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1285d5e508190b3124a70fe55b32e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:27 p.m.