Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong

E1031536

"Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong" is a philosophical work by Jerry Fodor that critiques mainstream cognitive science theories of concepts and argues for a more modular, language-of-thought-based account of the mind.

All labels observed (2)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (45)

Predicate Object
instanceOf book
non-fiction book
philosophical work
arguesFor atomistic theory of concepts
informational semantics for concepts
innateness of many concepts
author Jerry A. Fodor
linked to: Jerry Fodor

Jerry Fodor
critiques connectionist accounts of concepts
exemplar theories of concepts
mainstream cognitive science theories of concepts
prototype theories of concepts
theory-theory accounts of concepts
field cognitive science
philosophy
philosophy of psychology
genre analytic philosophy
hasForm monograph
hasPerspective nativist view of the mind
representational theory of mind
influencedBy Jerry Fodor’s earlier work on the language of thought
modularity theory
influences debates on cognitive architecture
debates on the nature of concepts
philosophy of cognitive science
intendedAudience cognitive scientists
philosophers of mind
philosophers of psychology
language English
mainTopic Fodor’s theory of concepts
cognitive science
concepts
language of thought
mental representation
modularity of mind
philosophy of cognitive science
philosophy of mind
opposes empiricist theories of concepts
holistic theories of conceptual content
philosophicalTradition analytic philosophy of mind
relatedWork Psychosemantics
The Language of Thought
The Modularity of Mind
supports language-of-thought hypothesis
modular view of the mind

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Jerry Fodor notableWork Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong
Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong mainTopic Fodor’s theory of concepts
linked to: Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong