Dusky v. United States

GPTKB entity

Statements (48)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseOutcome remanded for further proceedings
gptkbp:caseTypes No. 2
criminal law case
gptkbp:citedBy 362 U.S. 402
gptkbp:court reversed lower court's ruling
Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:historicalEvent involved prior mental health evaluations
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Dusky v. United States
gptkbp:impact set a precedent for mental health evaluations
gptkbp:judges Justice_Black_dissenting_opinion
Justice_Potter_Stewart_authored_opinion
gptkbp:jurisdiction federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:legalStatus competency to stand trial
defendant represented by counsel
influenced mental health law
Dusky standard
competency must be assessed at trial
defendant found incompetent
gptkbp:notableFeature case has implications for mental health professionals
Dusky appealed the ruling
Dusky had a history of mental illness
Dusky was charged with a crime
case addressed due process rights
case emphasized ability to assist counsel
case emphasized understanding of proceedings
case established a two-pronged test for competency
case has been cited in numerous subsequent cases
case has implications for civil rights
case has implications for criminal justice system
case involved constitutional rights
case involved mental competency standards
case is often referenced in legal education
competency was questioned during trial
important for defendants with mental illness
Supreme_Court_reviewed_the_case
trial_court_ruled_Dusky_competent
Supreme_Court_found_errors_in_the_trial_court's_decision
gptkbp:outcome established standards for competency
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation gptkb:United_States
Dusky
gptkbp:precedent competency standards in criminal law
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Indiana_v._Edwards
gptkb:Godinez_v._Moran
gptkb:Pate_v._Robinson
gptkbp:significance influenced future competency evaluations
gptkbp:year 1960