Statements (53)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:appeal |
no appeal filed
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil rights case
2:00-CV-70206 |
gptkbp:citedBy |
No. 2:00-CV-70206
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:State_of_Michigan
gptkb:John_Doe gptkb:United_States_District_Court majority opinion violation of rights fundamental fairness struck down provisions registration requirements unconstitutional state compliance with ruling |
gptkbp:date |
January 2000
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
unconstitutional
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Doe v. Michigan
|
gptkbp:impact |
national sex offender policies
sex offender laws |
gptkbp:issue |
sex offender registration
|
gptkbp:judges |
none
favorable to plaintiff |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
federal_district_court |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
ex post facto law
state registration requirements |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:ACLU
private attorney constitutional implications |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
due process rights
rational basis review federal constitutional law post-conviction rights |
gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Megan's_Law
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
constitutional law
constitutional law cases protection of individual rights constitutional challenges influenced future legislation challenged sex offender laws rights of convicted individuals sex offender registration issues |
gptkbp:outcome |
changed registration laws
injunction against enforcement invalidated state law provisions |
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Doe_v._Bolton
constitutional rights |
gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
federal_judiciary
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Smith_v._Doe
|
gptkbp:state |
Michigan_Sex_Offender_Registration_Act
|
gptkbp:tactics |
retroactive application
|
gptkbp:unitAwards |
public safety
|
gptkbp:year |
2000
|