Statements (14)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
Legal Doctrine
|
| gptkbp:appliesTo |
Pre-constitutional laws
Indian Constitutional Law |
| gptkbp:compatibleWith |
Post-constitutional laws
|
| gptkbp:effect |
Law remains dormant until the inconsistency is removed
|
| gptkbp:effectOnLaw |
Law is revived if the inconsistency is removed by constitutional amendment
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Doctrine of Eclipse
|
| gptkbp:notableCase |
Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1955)
|
| gptkbp:originatedIn |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:relatedConcept |
gptkb:Doctrine_of_Severability
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Fundamental Rights
|
| gptkbp:state |
A law inconsistent with fundamental rights is not void ab initio but becomes unenforceable
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Article_13_of_the_Indian_Constitution
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|