Dissent in the ADM Jabalpur case
GPTKB entity
Statements (51)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Preventive detention upheld
|
gptkbp:context |
Constitution of India
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Justice_P.N._Bhagwati
gptkb:Justice_H.R._Khanna Justice A.N. Ray Justice M.H. Beg |
gptkbp:criticism |
Judicial overreach
|
gptkbp:historicalContext |
gptkb:Indira_Gandhi's_government
|
gptkbp:historicalSignificance |
Judicial review
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Dissent in the ADM Jabalpur case
|
gptkbp:impact |
Civil_liberties_in_India
|
gptkbp:influenced |
Constitutional amendments
Future legal interpretations |
gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_P.N._Bhagwati
gptkb:Justice_H.R._Khanna 4 Constitutionalism Civil rights movements November 1976 Justice M.H. Beg Activism vs. restraint Limited during Emergency Justice_Beg's_view Justice_Bhagwati's_view Justice_Khanna's_view |
gptkbp:keyIssues |
Fundamental rights
|
gptkbp:lawEnforcement |
Post-Emergency reforms
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
Right to life
Government actions Human rights discourse Emergency powers Right to personal liberty Debate on dissent Future of fundamental rights Judicial independence questioned Political climate of 1970s India Upheld preventive detention laws |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
gptkb:ADM_Jabalpur_v._Shivkant_Shukla
Legal precedent Landmark judgment Legal scholars' perspectives Emergency_period_in_India |
gptkbp:participants |
5
|
gptkbp:politicalParty |
Justice A.N. Ray
|
gptkbp:precedent |
Constitutional law
|
gptkbp:relatedTo |
Emergency_in_India
Article_21_of_the_Constitution Article_22_of_the_Constitution |
gptkbp:year |
1976
|