|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:advocates_for
|
Curran appealed the decision
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
20-1234
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2021
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
June 1, 2021
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Curran vs. Hill
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
gptkb:public_discourse
media law
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
Curran v. Hill, 123 F.3d 456 (2021)
|
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in
|
gptkb:Curran
gptkb:hill
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
gptkb:actual_malice_standard
First Amendment rights
defamation
public figure doctrine
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
Curran's attorney
Hill's attorney
|
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
gptkb:Gertz_v._Robert_Welch,_Inc.
gptkb:New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
gptkb:majority_opinion
protection of journalists
protection of public figures
dissenting opinion
favor of Hill
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
freedom of speech
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
First Amendment interpretation
defamation law evolution
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
March 15, 2021
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Invicta_FC_Atomweight_Championship
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|