Cth v. Australian Broadcasting Corporation
GPTKB entity
Properties (59)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
appeal_from_Federal_Court
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
B43/2011
|
| gptkbp:court |
unanimous decision
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Australia
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Cth v. Australian Broadcasting Corporation
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Australian_media_law
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Commonwealth_of_Australia
gptkb:Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Susan_Crennan
gptkb:Justice_Patrick_Keane gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Gageler gptkb:Chief_Justice_Robert_French gptkb:Justice_Virginia_Bell 2012-06-28 Justice_Kenneth_Hayne |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Solicitor-General_of_Australia
cultural diversity public accountability digital media journalistic integrity public interest advertising standards cultural representation government funding constitutional law audience engagement intellectual property audience trust censorship freedom of information government oversight media regulation media literacy news reporting public service broadcasting broadcasting rights content distribution government transparency privacy rights social media impact broadcasting technology media ownership content regulation media accountability defamation media ethics broadcasting standards media funding media convergence audience rights news diversity ABC's_legal_team |
| gptkbp:outcome |
decision_in_favor_of_ABC
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal principles
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation_v._Lenah_Game_Meats_Pty_Ltd
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
public broadcasting
|
| gptkbp:significance |
freedom of speech
|
| gptkbp:year |
2012
|