Properties (53)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
defendant
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 1234
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
123 A.3d 456
2020 PA 123 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:date |
March 10, 2020
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Commonwealth v. Jones
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal justice system
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Commonwealth_of_Pennsylvania
defendant_Jones |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Doe
3 judges |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Pennsylvania
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
due process right to counsel evidence admission |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
private attorney |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
self-defense
beyond a reasonable doubt preponderance of evidence insufficient evidence jury instructions |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
media coverage
policy changes civil rights community impact constitutional law law students legal reforms judges legal scholars public perception landmark ruling attorneys victim rights legal ethics judicial accountability future cases defendant rights law_enforcement_practices |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
conviction upheld reversed remanded |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Roe
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
case law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Commonwealth_v._Brown
gptkb:Commonwealth_v._Smith |
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
January 15, 2020
|