Statements (20)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:alsoKnownAs |
National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) case
|
| gptkbp:cause |
violation of basic structure of the Constitution
|
| gptkbp:citation |
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (2015) 6 SCC 408
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:India
|
| gptkbp:date |
2015
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
Justice J. Chelameswar
|
| gptkbp:followedBy |
Collegium system reforms debate
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Collegium System Act case
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Reaffirmed judicial primacy in appointments
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_J.S._Khehar
|
| gptkbp:powers |
5-judge Constitution Bench
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Constitution (Ninety-ninth Amendment) Act, 2014
National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 |
| gptkbp:result |
NJAC Act and 99th Constitutional Amendment struck down
|
| gptkbp:subject |
Judicial appointments
|
| gptkbp:upheld |
Collegium system for appointment of judges
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Indian_Judiciary
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|