Statements (31)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
Violation of federal law
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal case
No. 1 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 264
19 U.S. 264 (1821) |
| gptkbp:context |
Post-War_of_1812_legal_landscape
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Affirmed lower court's decision |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1821
Unanimous decision |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
Federalism
|
| gptkbp:established |
Yes
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Early 19th century America
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Cohens v. Virginia
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Strengthened federal judicial power
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of Virginia
Cohens_brothers |
| gptkbp:judges |
nan
Cohens_found_guilty |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Judicial review
State vs. Federal authority |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Cohens_represented_by_attorney
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Influenced future federal-state relations
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Reinforced federal authority
Supreme_Court_upheld_federal_authority |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Federal supremacy over state laws
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:McCulloch_v._Maryland
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Established precedent for federal review of state court decisions
|
| gptkbp:state |
Virginia_lottery_law
|
| gptkbp:superintendent |
gptkb:John_Marshall
|