California v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
GPTKB entity
Properties (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
pending appeal
Uber's_appeal_against_the_ruling |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil case
CGC-19-580197 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Superior_Court_of_California
|
| gptkbp:date |
2021-05-05
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:filedIn |
2019
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
California v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gig economy regulations
|
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
public opinion
political climate |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Uber_Technologies,_Inc.
State of California |
| gptkbp:judges |
court's judgment on driver classification
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
California_state_law
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:California_Attorney_General
employment classification employment status of gig workers significant for gig workers California's_argument_for_employee_status Uber's_argument_for_independent_contractor_status Uber's_legal_team |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
extensive media coverage
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
no settlement reached
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
affects other gig companies
affects_Uber's_business_model ruling_in_favor_of_California |
| gptkbp:precedent |
employment law cases
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
worker rights
mixed public reaction |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:California_Assembly
healthcare benefits labor unions legal reforms labor rights legal precedents minimum wage laws court rulings unemployment insurance worker protections employment rights advocacy worker advocacy groups employment benefits worker compensation contractor rights AB 5 legislation Proposition 22 gig economy challenges worker classification laws California_labor_law |
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2020-09-01
|
| gptkbp:year |
2021
|