California v. Postmates Inc.
GPTKB entity
Properties (60)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
no
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
public policy
delivery services state regulations federal regulations legal framework business practices labor rights legal precedents business models labor relations judicial interpretation worker protections labor market social implications economic implications workforce dynamics settled out of court employment standards contractor classification freelance workers worker advocacy employment benefits contractor rights employment law evolution gig workers worker classification standards |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil
19STCV20212 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Superior_Court
|
| gptkbp:date |
2020-04-01
|
| gptkbp:filingCountry |
gptkb:California
gptkb:Postmates_Inc. |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
California v. Postmates Inc.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
worker rights
|
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
gptkb:California_Assembly_Bill_5
|
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:Postmates_Inc.
State of California |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:California_Attorney_General
employment law employment classification gig economy regulations Postmates legal team |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
high
|
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:California_Labor_Code
gptkb:California_Assembly_Bill_5 |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
policy changes
gig economy financial compensation undisclosed resolved |
| gptkbp:outcome |
settled
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
AB 5
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
worker classification laws
|
| gptkbp:publicationDate |
2020-04-01
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Dynamex_Operations_West,_Inc._v._Superior_Court
|
| gptkbp:year |
2019
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
2019-08-01
|