|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
not applicable
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
extensively analyzed by legal experts
filed in federal court
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
extensive documentation available
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
settlement agreement
significant for tech regulation
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
tech industry regulations
|
|
gptkbp:clinical_trial
|
settlement reached
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
increased scrutiny on tech companies
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Microsoft_Corporation
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
gptkb:State_of_California
|
|
gptkbp:date_settled
|
November 2001
|
|
gptkbp:duration
|
3 years
high complexity
over three years
|
|
gptkbp:economic_impact
|
software industry
|
|
gptkbp:has_meetings
|
held during case
|
|
gptkbp:historical_period
|
spanned several years
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
California v. Microsoft
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
software market
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
various states
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_basis_for
|
California Business and Professions Code
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
Judge J. Frederick Motz
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
antitrust law framework
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
antitrust laws
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
aggressive defense
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:California_Attorney_General
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
gptkb:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act
|
|
gptkbp:major_city
|
$1.1 billion
court approval required
lengthy process
changes in business practices
confidential terms
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
high-profile case
|
|
gptkbp:microsoft's_compliance
|
required post-settlement
|
|
gptkbp:microsoft's_defense
|
market competition argument
|
|
gptkbp:microsoft's_market_practices
|
under scrutiny
|
|
gptkbp:microsoft's_market_share
|
dominant in PC operating systems
|
|
gptkbp:microsoft's_obligations
|
compliance with settlement terms
|
|
gptkbp:microsoft's_response
|
denial of wrongdoing
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
gptkb:Roman_settlement
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
antitrust enforcement
influenced future antitrust cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_interest
|
consumer rights
|
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
mixed opinions
|
|
gptkbp:publication_year
|
May 18, 1998
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Microsoft_Corporation
|
|
gptkbp:resolution
|
settlement reached
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_announcement
|
publicly announced
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_benefits
|
consumer protection measures
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_enforcement
|
monitored by court
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_impact
|
software licensing practices
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_monitoring
|
ongoing monitoring required.
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_provisions
|
business practice changes
|
|
gptkbp:state
|
multiple states involved
|
|
gptkbp:state's_argument
|
anti-competitive behavior
|
|
gptkbp:state's_legal_team
|
comprised of multiple attorneys
|
|
gptkbp:strategy
|
monopolistic practices
|
|
gptkbp:witnesses
|
economists
provided by industry experts
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2001
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Microsoft
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|