|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legislation
|
|
gptkbp:advocates_for
|
environmental groups
|
|
gptkbp:applies_to
|
beverage containers
|
|
gptkbp:bottle_deposit_system
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:bottle_redemption_centers
|
available
|
|
gptkbp:bottle_redemption_rate
|
varies by state
|
|
gptkbp:bottle_types_covered
|
gptkb:plastic
gptkb:glass
aluminum
|
|
gptkbp:community_involvement
|
encouraged
|
|
gptkbp:consumer_incentive
|
financial return
|
|
gptkbp:controversy
|
effectiveness
economic impact
|
|
gptkbp:deposit_return
|
5 to 10 cents
|
|
gptkbp:economic_impact
|
job creation in recycling sector
|
|
gptkbp:educational_programs
|
promote recycling
|
|
gptkbp:enacted_by
|
gptkb:1971
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:enforces
|
state agencies
|
|
gptkbp:environmental_impact
|
reduced landfill waste
conserved resources
|
|
gptkbp:funding
|
bottle deposits
|
|
gptkbp:governing_body
|
varies by state
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Bottle Bill
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
decreased litter
increased recycling rates
|
|
gptkbp:includes_provisions_for
|
certain beverages
certain containers
|
|
gptkbp:is_implemented_in
|
gptkb:Australia
gptkb:Canada
gptkb:Germany
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
state law
Container Deposit Legislation
|
|
gptkbp:legislative_challenges
|
opposition from industry
|
|
gptkbp:opponent
|
beverage industry
|
|
gptkbp:packaging
|
up to 90% in some states
|
|
gptkbp:public_awareness
|
yes
|
|
gptkbp:public_health_benefit
|
reduced pollution
|
|
gptkbp:purpose
|
reduce litter
promote recycling
|
|
gptkbp:recycling_infrastructure
|
improved
|
|
gptkbp:revenue
|
millions annually
|
|
gptkbp:states_with_bottle_bills
|
gptkb:California
gptkb:Michigan
gptkb:New_York
gptkb:Oregon
|
|
gptkbp:support
|
generally high
|
|
gptkbp:tourism_impact
|
positive
|
|
gptkbp:trends
|
increased public awareness
expansion of bottle bills
|
|
gptkbp:wildlife
|
positive
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Tom_Mc_Call
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|