Statements (65)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:battle
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:armor
|
| gptkbp:aftermath |
Consolidation of British control in Sudan.
|
| gptkbp:analysis |
Studied in military history courses.
|
| gptkbp:casualties |
British casualties were relatively low.
Mahdist casualties were significant. |
| gptkbp:combatants |
gptkb:British_Empire
gptkb:Mahdist_forces |
| gptkbp:commander |
gptkb:General_Sir_Archibald_Wolseley
General Sir Archibald Wolseley was a key figure. Mahdi forces leader |
| gptkbp:community_impact |
Struggle for control in North Africa.
|
| gptkbp:conflict |
Demonstrated the effectiveness of British military tactics.
Led to changes in military strategy. |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced British public opinion on imperialism.
|
| gptkbp:cultural_impact |
Influenced perceptions of the British Empire.
|
| gptkbp:cultural_references |
Referenced in literature about colonialism.
|
| gptkbp:date |
1885
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
Influenced British military doctrine.
|
| gptkbp:duration |
One day.
|
| gptkbp:economic_impact |
Contributed to the eventual establishment of Anglo-Egyptian Sudan.
|
| gptkbp:followed_by |
Battle of Omdurman.
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Examined for its implications on future conflicts.
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Subject to various interpretations by historians.
Part of the larger conflict between the British and the Mahdist state. Set against the backdrop of European imperialism. |
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
Controversy over the justification of British intervention.
|
| gptkbp:historical_documentation |
Recorded in various military history texts.
|
| gptkbp:historical_event |
One of the notable battles in the 19th century.
Remembered in the context of colonial conflicts. |
| gptkbp:historical_impact |
Influenced British colonial policy in Africa.
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Considered a key event in Sudanese history.
Marked a turning point in the Second Sudanese War. |
| gptkbp:historical_source |
Documented in military archives.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Battle of Tofrek
|
| gptkbp:involved_forces |
Infantry and cavalry units.
Included local militia and volunteers. |
| gptkbp:is_celebrated_in |
Remembered in military history.
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Part of the narrative of British imperialism.
Part of the legacy of British military history. |
| gptkbp:location |
Tofrek, Sudan
|
| gptkbp:logistics |
Involved complex supply chains.
|
| gptkbp:military_branch |
Included regular army and colonial troops.
|
| gptkbp:military_strategy |
Combined arms approach.
Defensive tactics. Engaged in close combat. Part of a series of campaigns in Sudan. |
| gptkbp:military_technology |
Use of artillery by British forces.
|
| gptkbp:narrative_style |
Part of the broader story of British colonial expansion.
Contributed to the narrative of British military success. |
| gptkbp:notable_allies |
Involved alliances with local tribes.
|
| gptkbp:notable_battle |
Studied in military academies.
Battle of Abu Klea. Lessons learned applied in future conflicts. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Strengthened British presence in Sudan.
|
| gptkbp:part_of |
gptkb:Second_Sudanese_War
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
Siege of Khartoum.
|
| gptkbp:result |
British victory
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Part of the British campaign to regain control of Sudan.
|
| gptkbp:strategic_importance |
Analyzed for its military tactics.
Control of the Nile River. To secure the region for British interests. |
| gptkbp:tactics |
To defeat Mahdist forces decisively.
Use of modern military tactics by British forces. |