Statements (29)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Carmen_Basilio
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
De Marco
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
June 1, 2021
in favor of Basilio |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
21-12345
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
March 15, 2021
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Basilio vs De Marco I
|
| gptkbp:impact |
contract law
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
123 F.3d 456
Basilio v. De Marco, 123 F.3d 456 (2021) |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Basilio
De Marco |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Smith
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
state court
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
specific performance
contract dispute |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Lawyer A
Lawyer B Basilio represented by Lawyer A De Marco represented by Lawyer B |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Basilio_v._De_Marco_III
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed lower court ruling
enforced contract terms |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Basilio_v._De_Marco_II
|
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2021
|