Statements (44)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:Constitution
|
gptkbp:aimsTo |
reduce national debt
|
gptkbp:associated_with |
gptkb:Tea_Party_movement
|
gptkbp:can_be |
government spending flexibility
|
gptkbp:controversy |
political parties
its feasibility |
gptkbp:criticism |
potential economic consequences
|
gptkbp:designedBy |
require the federal government to not spend more than its income
|
gptkbp:enactedBy |
some state legislatures
|
gptkbp:has_a_focus_on |
fiscal policy advocacy groups
|
gptkbp:has_implications_for |
economic stability
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Balanced Budget Amendment
|
gptkbp:impact |
federal programs
social safety net programs |
gptkbp:influenced |
public opinion
|
gptkbp:introduced |
various lawmakers
|
gptkbp:is_a_resource_for |
future federal budgets
|
gptkbp:is_a_subject_of |
academic research
political debate government reform |
gptkbp:is_a_way_to |
control government spending
|
gptkbp:is_accessible_by |
some policymakers
|
gptkbp:is_designed_to |
promote fiscal responsibility
multiple_times_in_Congress |
gptkbp:is_part_of |
broader budget reform discussions
the national fiscal policy debate |
gptkbp:is_studied_in |
policy experts
|
gptkbp:is_supported_by |
fiscal_conservatives
|
gptkbp:is_used_in |
government accountability
deficit reduction budgetary discussions state balanced budget laws state-level budget amendments |
gptkbp:leads |
increased political polarization
mandatory spending cuts |
gptkbp:legislation |
some conservative groups
has not been ratified to_amend_the_U.S._Constitution |
gptkbp:measures |
prevent future deficits
|
gptkbp:opposedBy |
some economists
|
gptkbp:related_to |
fiscal policy
|
gptkbp:requires |
balanced budgets during economic downturns
supermajority for tax increases |
gptkbp:was_a_response_to |
growing national debt
|