Baigent v Random House Group Ltd
GPTKB entity
Statements (23)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:alsoKnownAs |
Baigent & Leigh v Random House
|
| gptkbp:appealsTo |
appeal dismissed
|
| gptkbp:author |
gptkb:Dan_Brown
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[2007] EWCA Civ 247
|
| gptkbp:date |
2006
|
| gptkbp:defendant |
Random House Group Ltd
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Baigent v Random House Group Ltd
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales
High Court of Justice Lord Justice Mummery Peter Smith J |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:notableFor |
landmark UK copyright case
|
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
gptkb:Michael_Baigent
gptkb:Richard_Leigh |
| gptkbp:principle |
ideas are not protected by copyright
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:The_Da_Vinci_Code
gptkb:The_Holy_Blood_and_the_Holy_Grail |
| gptkbp:result |
case dismissed
|
| gptkbp:subject |
copyright infringement
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Michael_Baigent
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|