Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment
GPTKB entity
Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:book
|
| gptkbp:adaptation |
gptkb:film
|
| gptkbp:author |
gptkb:James_H._Jones
|
| gptkbp:available_formats |
E-book
Hardcover Paperback |
| gptkbp:awards |
National Book Award finalist
|
| gptkbp:critical_reception |
Generally positive
|
| gptkbp:discusses |
Patient rights
Community health initiatives Informed consent Ethical implications of research Public health reforms Public health ethics Survivors' testimonies Impact on African American communities Ethical review boards Apologies from the government Cultural impact of the study Educational initiatives on ethics Government trust issues Historical context of the study Historical documentation of the study Legacy of the Tuskegee Study Long-term effects of the study Media representation of the study Medical racism Racial discrimination in healthcare Role of the CDC Syphilis treatment history |
| gptkbp:focus |
Ethical issues in medical research
|
| gptkbp:genre |
gptkb:Author
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Increased awareness of medical ethics
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
Public health education
Public health policy Social justice movements Documentary filmmaking on medical ethics Ethics in clinical trials Historical research on race and medicine Literature on medical malpractice |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Medical journals
|
| gptkbp:isbn |
978-0029114510
|
| gptkbp:language |
English
|
| gptkbp:notable_quote |
“ The study was a violation of ethics.”
|
| gptkbp:page_count |
gptkb:368
|
| gptkbp:published_year |
gptkb:1981
|
| gptkbp:publisher |
gptkb:Free_Press
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study
|
| gptkbp:subject |
gptkb:Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study
|
| gptkbp:translated_into |
gptkb:Spanish
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:James_H._Jones
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|