Ayodhya case (Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India)
GPTKB entity
Statements (23)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
(1994) 6 SCC 360
|
| gptkbp:date |
24 October 1994
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced later Ayodhya title suit
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
gptkb:Justice_N.P._Singh gptkb:Justice_S.P._Bharucha gptkb:Justice_A.M._Ahmadi gptkb:Justice_B.P._Jeevan_Reddy Justice J.S. Verma Upheld the constitutionality of the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993 Held that mosque is not essential to Islam for offering namaz |
| gptkbp:numberOfIssues |
Acquisition of religious property
Constitutionality of Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993 |
| gptkbp:petitioner |
Ismail Faruqui
|
| gptkbp:powers |
5 judges
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Ayodhya_dispute
gptkb:Babri_Masjid |
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:Union_of_India
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Justice_J._S._Verma
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Ayodhya case (Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India)
|