Statements (23)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:appealsTo |
ongoing (as of 2023)
|
| gptkbp:destroyedBy |
$506 million (initial Texas verdict)
£5 million (UK High Court) |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Apple v. Optis Wireless
|
| gptkbp:industry |
telecommunications
|
| gptkbp:involvedIn |
gptkb:Apple_Inc.
Optis Wireless Technology |
| gptkbp:judge |
UK High Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
FRAND licensing
|
| gptkbp:notableFor |
large patent damages award
dispute over fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
standard-essential patents
Optis v. Apple (UK) |
| gptkbp:result |
jury found Apple infringed patents
|
| gptkbp:startDate |
2019
|
| gptkbp:subject |
patent infringement
|
| gptkbp:technology |
LTE
4G |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Apple_Inc._litigation
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|