Statements (27)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:appealsTo |
both parties appealed
|
| gptkbp:Apple_claim |
App Store policies are necessary for security and privacy
|
| gptkbp:Apple_response |
removed Fortnite from App Store
|
| gptkbp:court_ruling |
Apple is not a monopoly under federal antitrust law
Apple must allow developers to direct users to alternative payment methods Apple's anti-steering provisions are anti-competitive |
| gptkbp:defendant |
gptkb:Apple_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:endDate |
2021
|
| gptkbp:Epic_Games_action |
introduced direct payment system in Fortnite
|
| gptkbp:Epic_Games_claim |
Apple's App Store practices are anti-competitive
|
| gptkbp:Epic_Games_response |
filed lawsuit against Apple
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced app store regulations and policies
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Yvonne_Gonzalez_Rogers
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California
|
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:plaintiff |
gptkb:Epic_Games
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Fortnite
Epic Games v. Google |
| gptkbp:result |
mixed ruling
|
| gptkbp:startDate |
2020
|
| gptkbp:subject |
antitrust
in-app purchases app store policies |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Apple_Inc._litigation
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Apple v. Epic Games
|