Statements (25)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
affected patent licensing practices
influenced global smartphone supply chain |
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_California
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableLawyers |
gptkb:Don_Rosenberg
gptkb:Evan_Chesler gptkb:Theodore_Boutrous gptkb:William_Isaacson |
| gptkbp:party |
gptkb:Apple_Inc.
gptkb:Qualcomm_Inc. |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
5G technology
mobile phone patents |
| gptkbp:result |
settled
|
| gptkbp:settlementPeriod |
2019
|
| gptkbp:settlementType |
Apple agreed to pay Qualcomm
multi-year chipset supply agreement |
| gptkbp:startDate |
2017
|
| gptkbp:subject |
antitrust
licensing patent dispute |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Qualcomm
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|