|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
UK Supreme Court case
|
|
gptkbp:application
|
gptkb:Privacy_International
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
[2019] 2 WLR 1219
[2019] 3 All ER 1015
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2019-05-15
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
[2019] UKSC 22
|
|
gptkbp:importantFor
|
affirmed principle of judicial review in UK constitutional law
landmark case on limits of ouster clauses
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Lady_Hale
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
gptkb:Lord_Sumption
gptkb:Lord_Reed
gptkb:Lord_Briggs
gptkb:Lord_Lloyd-Jones
gptkb:Lord_Carnwath
gptkb:Lord_Wilson
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
judicial review
jurisdiction of courts
ouster clauses
|
|
gptkbp:legislature
|
gptkb:Regulation_of_Investigatory_Powers_Act_2000
gptkb:Justice_and_Security_Act_2013
|
|
gptkbp:neutralCitation
|
gptkb:[2019]_UKSC_22
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:R_(on_the_application_of_Privacy_International)_v_Investigatory_Powers_Tribunal_and_others
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Investigatory_Powers_Tribunal
|
|
gptkbp:result
|
Supreme Court held that ouster clause did not prevent judicial review of Investigatory Powers Tribunal decisions
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
surveillance
judicial oversight
investigatory powers
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:R_(Privacy_International)_v_Investigatory_Powers_Tribunal
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|