Triple
T9951325
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Neogrammarian hypothesis of sound laws |
E195336
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | principle of historical linguistics |
C23974
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: principle of historical linguistics Context triple: [Neogrammarian hypothesis of sound laws, instanceOf, principle of historical linguistics]
-
A.
hypothesis in historical linguistics
chosen
A hypothesis in historical linguistics is a proposed explanation of how and why specific linguistic features or relationships between languages have changed over time, formulated to be tested against comparative and historical evidence.
-
B.
historical language classification
Historical language classification is the systematic grouping and analysis of languages based on their documented evolution, genealogical relationships, and changes over time.
-
C.
historical sound change
Historical sound change is the systematic alteration of speech sounds in a language over time, resulting in predictable shifts in pronunciation patterns across generations.
-
D.
historical language
A historical language is a natural language studied in the context of its past stages, evolution, and usage within specific historical periods and societies.
-
E.
linguistic theory
Linguistic theory is the systematic study and modeling of the structure, use, and acquisition of language, aiming to explain how languages are organized, processed, and understood.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca82e96a108190932bd1fc4acd73a0 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:46 p.m.