Triple

T9950518
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ohio Pilot Project Scholarship Program E195316 entity
Predicate legalPrecedentImpact P39579 FINISHED
Object clarified constitutionality of school vouchers including religious schools LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: clarified constitutionality of school vouchers including religious schools | Statement: [Ohio Pilot Project Scholarship Program, legalPrecedentImpact, clarified constitutionality of school vouchers including religious schools]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrecedentImpact
Context triple: [Ohio Pilot Project Scholarship Program, legalPrecedentImpact, clarified constitutionality of school vouchers including religious schools]
  • A. legalPrecedentInvolved
    Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
  • B. legalDoctrineInfluenced
    Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
  • C. impactOnLaw chosen
    Indicates the effect or influence that one entity, event, or action has on laws, legal rules, or the legal system.
  • D. courtInfluence
    Indicates that one party exerts or holds influence over decisions, outcomes, or behavior within a court or judicial setting.
  • E. influencedCourtDecision
    Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82e96a108190932bd1fc4acd73a0 completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb65b83ac8190af6bd8c918ffb69f completed April 2, 2026, 12:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd1d97c44081908730071269f07712 completed April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:45 p.m.