Triple
T993939
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Counter-Reformation |
E21452
|
entity |
| Predicate | doctrinalOutcome |
P21672
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rejection of Protestant doctrines |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rejection of Protestant doctrines | Statement: [Counter-Reformation, doctrinalOutcome, rejection of Protestant doctrines]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrinalOutcome Context triple: [Counter-Reformation, doctrinalOutcome, rejection of Protestant doctrines]
-
A.
doctrinalStatus
Indicates the formal standing or classification of a belief, teaching, or doctrine within a particular religious or ideological system.
-
B.
doctrinalStance
Indicates the specific set of doctrines, beliefs, or official teachings that an entity adheres to or promotes.
-
C.
doctrinalEmphasis
Indicates a relationship where a doctrine, belief system, or teaching is given particular focus, priority, or stress within a religious, ideological, or organizational context.
-
D.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
-
E.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493c476b48190b41fc5e793171cc6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b4c5e16881908cd5f7ba2fcd5084 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b2af071c819086c374a16307dfe0 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b30efd2c8190b780a6dee086d0aa |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:41 p.m.