Triple

T9932233
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject TSIG E192672 entity
Predicate positionInMessage P91207 FINISHED
Object additional section of DNS message LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: additional section of DNS message | Statement: [TSIG, positionInMessage, additional section of DNS message]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionInMessage
Context triple: [TSIG, positionInMessage, additional section of DNS message]
  • A. positionInField
    Indicates the specific role, location, or functional placement an entity occupies within a defined field, domain, or area of activity.
  • B. positionInMass
    Indicates that an entity occupies a specific location or role within a larger undifferentiated group, collection, or mass.
  • C. positionInCase
    Indicates the specific role, status, or placement that an entity holds within a particular case or legal proceeding.
  • D. positionInEvent
    Indicates the specific role, placement, or ordering that an entity has within a particular event.
  • E. positionInState
    Indicates that one entity occupies or holds a specific position, role, or status within a particular state or condition of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82dd978c8190947124ab0d3315ac completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb5b7897081909b28189aa57af250 completed April 2, 2026, 12:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd1d9428cc81909b4b4938566d78a7 completed April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd3581a9688190a00cef4c3eebb0ae completed April 1, 2026, 3:10 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:43 p.m.