Triple

T9902002
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Johnny E182306 entity
Predicate typicalFormality P4035 FINISHED
Object informal LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: informal | Statement: [Johnny, typicalFormality, informal]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalFormality
Context triple: [Johnny, typicalFormality, informal]
  • A. formalityLevel chosen
    Indicates the degree of social or stylistic formality characterizing an interaction, expression, or context between entities.
  • B. typicalForm
    Indicates that one entity represents the standard, characteristic, or most common form or shape in which another entity typically appears or is realized.
  • C. formalSetting
    Indicates that the associated interaction, event, or context occurs in a formal or official setting governed by explicit social or institutional norms.
  • D. isLessFormalThan
    Indicates that one entity has a lower level of formality or is more casual in style, tone, or usage compared to another entity.
  • E. formalismFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as a formal representation, framework, or notation specifically designed to model, describe, or reason about another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82876f8081909cf75df0f99bb13f completed March 30, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb4e221448190b536742d1269f9d7 completed April 2, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd1d8c584081908b73de75eb18e438 completed April 1, 2026, 1:28 p.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:40 p.m.