Triple
T9852402
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Peel Commission partition proposal |
E239498
|
entity |
| Predicate | includedProposalFor |
P61956
|
FINISHED |
| Object | population transfer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: population transfer | Statement: [Peel Commission partition proposal, includedProposalFor, population transfer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includedProposalFor Context triple: [Peel Commission partition proposal, includedProposalFor, population transfer]
-
A.
relatedProposal
Indicates that one proposal has a specified relationship or association with another proposal.
-
B.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
-
C.
proposedPart
chosen
Indicates that one entity has been suggested or put forward to serve as a component or element of another entity.
-
D.
notableProposal
Indicates that an entity is a proposal distinguished by particular significance, impact, or recognition compared to other proposals.
-
E.
consideredIn
Indicates that one entity is taken into account, examined, or included as a factor within the context, scope, or decision framework of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84e4fdc08190a624425bcef98665 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69cdb375ba448190a32cca2b0f376ac1 |
completed | April 2, 2026, 12:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69cd03e57cac8190914bb5ae608a6e0e |
completed | April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:34 p.m.