Triple

T9843725
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cauchy distribution E239287 entity
Predicate hasKurtosis P90313 FINISHED
Object undefined LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: undefined | Statement: [Cauchy distribution, hasKurtosis, undefined]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasKurtosis
Context triple: [Cauchy distribution, hasKurtosis, undefined]
  • A. excessKurtosis
    Indicates that a distribution’s kurtosis exceeds that of a normal distribution, reflecting heavier or lighter tails relative to the normal case.
  • B. hasHeavierTailsThan
    Indicates that the probability distribution of one entity has heavier tails—i.e., higher likelihood of extreme values—than the probability distribution of another entity.
  • C. hasSkewness
    Indicates that a distribution or dataset exhibits a specific degree and direction of asymmetry around its central value.
  • D. hasKPoint
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a specific K-point, typically a designated point in reciprocal or parameter space.
  • E. hasVariance
    Indicates that there is a measurable degree of variability or dispersion in the values or outcomes associated with the related entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84e3f0c48190ada72a65ebd50efd completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb35c8e348190aa090c71bf6f30eb completed April 2, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd03e57cac8190914bb5ae608a6e0e completed April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd06ace53081909b5f81f382f6591e completed April 1, 2026, 11:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:33 p.m.