Triple

T9830664
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Michigan v. Tucker E238772 entity
Predicate hasPrecedent P3138 FINISHED
Object Wong Sun v. United States E809985 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wong Sun v. United States | Statement: [Michigan v. Tucker, hasPrecedent, Wong Sun v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Wong Sun v. United States
Context triple: [Michigan v. Tucker, hasPrecedent, Wong Sun v. United States]
  • A. Wong Sun v. United States chosen
    Wong Sun v. United States is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the exclusionary rule by establishing the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine and clarifying when evidence obtained after an illegal search or arrest must be suppressed.
  • B. Fong Yue Ting v. United States
    Fong Yue Ting v. United States is an 1893 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld broad federal authority over immigration, affirming the government's power to deport non-citizens without full constitutional protections.
  • C. Katz v. United States
    Katz v. United States is a landmark 1967 Supreme Court case that redefined Fourth Amendment protections by establishing that the amendment safeguards people’s reasonable expectations of privacy, not just physical places.
  • D. Yasui v. United States
    Yasui v. United States was a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime conviction of Minoru Yasui for violating a military-imposed curfew on Japanese Americans, thereby affirming the government’s authority to restrict their civil liberties during World War II.
  • E. Mapp v. Ohio
    Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84e0dd1881909800765d1e21f735 completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb3297bd88190bf8c53a4ba00e0ae completed April 2, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d1d5bc17c08190ad094def4fbf9921 completed April 5, 2026, 3:23 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:32 p.m.