Triple

T9830572
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New York v. Quarles E238770 entity
Predicate policeQuestioningContext P53248 FINISHED
Object custodial interrogation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: custodial interrogation | Statement: [New York v. Quarles, policeQuestioningContext, custodial interrogation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: policeQuestioningContext
Context triple: [New York v. Quarles, policeQuestioningContext, custodial interrogation]
  • A. arrestContext
    Indicates that an arrest event occurs within a particular situational, legal, or environmental context that frames how and why the arrest takes place.
  • B. questionedIn chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the subject of questions or interrogation conducted by another entity, typically in a formal or investigative context.
  • C. policeControl
    Indicates that one entity exercises authoritative oversight, regulation, or enforcement power over another, as a police force does over people or areas under its jurisdiction.
  • D. policePresence
    Indicates that law enforcement officers are present at or monitoring a particular location, event, or situation.
  • E. subjectOfInquest
    Indicates that an entity is the focus or target of a formal inquest or official investigative proceeding.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84e0dd1881909800765d1e21f735 completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb3297bd88190bf8c53a4ba00e0ae completed April 2, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd03e30bc08190816c0a6d29c21b0f completed April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:32 p.m.