Triple

T9830566
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New York v. Quarles E238770 entity
Predicate publicSafetyExceptionCreated P90231 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [New York v. Quarles, publicSafetyExceptionCreated, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: publicSafetyExceptionCreated
Context triple: [New York v. Quarles, publicSafetyExceptionCreated, yes]
  • A. securityExceptionInvoked
    Indicates that a security-related exception has been triggered or raised during execution.
  • B. safetyFunction
    Indicates that one entity serves as a safety-related function or mechanism that protects, safeguards, or reduces risk for another entity or process.
  • C. safetyExpectation
    Indicates an expected level or standard of safety that should be maintained or provided in a given context or relationship.
  • D. notableSafety
    Indicates that an entity is recognized for having significant safety characteristics, performance, or impact relative to others.
  • E. observationSafety
    Indicates that an observation or monitoring activity is conducted in a manner that ensures the safety of the subjects, observers, and environment involved.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84e0dd1881909800765d1e21f735 completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb3297bd88190bf8c53a4ba00e0ae completed April 2, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69cd03e30bc08190816c0a6d29c21b0f completed April 1, 2026, 11:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69cd06abc9248190a506b64e9c516d03 completed April 1, 2026, 11:51 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:32 p.m.