Triple

T9830559
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New York v. Quarles E238770 entity
Predicate holding P2237 FINISHED
Object The Court recognized a public safety exception to the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before custodial interrogation. E238770 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Court recognized a public safety exception to the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before custodial interrogation. | Statement: [New York v. Quarles, holding, The Court recognized a public safety exception to the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before custodial interrogation.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: The Court recognized a public safety exception to the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before custodial interrogation.
Context triple: [New York v. Quarles, holding, The Court recognized a public safety exception to the requirement that Miranda warnings be given before custodial interrogation.]
  • A. Miranda v. Arizona
    Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations.
  • B. dissenting opinion in Miranda v. Arizona
    The dissenting opinion in Miranda v. Arizona is Justice Byron R. White’s critique of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling that established mandatory police warnings to suspects, arguing it unduly restricted effective law enforcement.
  • C. New York v. Quarles chosen
    New York v. Quarles is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created the "public safety" exception to the Miranda warning requirement, allowing certain unwarned statements to be admitted when needed to protect public safety.
  • D. The Right to Remain Silent
    The Right to Remain Silent is a crime novel by Charles Brandt that showcases his expertise in criminal law and interrogation through a tense, procedurally detailed narrative.
  • E. Florida v. Jardines
    Florida v. Jardines is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held using a drug-sniffing dog on a homeowner’s porch constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment, requiring a warrant.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca84e0dd1881909800765d1e21f735 completed March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cdb3297bd88190bf8c53a4ba00e0ae completed April 2, 2026, 12:07 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d1cc8ca2808190a1da0641162f12d1 completed April 5, 2026, 2:44 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:32 p.m.