Triple
T97993
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vitaphone |
E1974
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithTerm |
P2830
|
FINISHED |
| Object | talkies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: talkies | Statement: [Vitaphone, associatedWithTerm, talkies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithTerm Context triple: [Vitaphone, associatedWithTerm, talkies]
-
A.
isAssociatedWith
chosen
Indicates that there exists a connection, relationship, or involvement between two entities without specifying its exact nature.
-
B.
organizationAssociatedWith
Indicates that there is a formal or recognized connection or affiliation between an organization and another entity.
-
C.
notablyAssociatedWith
Indicates that one entity is prominently or distinctively connected with another in a way that is especially noteworthy or remarkable.
-
D.
associatedWithDiscipline
Indicates that an entity has a relevant connection or involvement with a particular academic, professional, or thematic discipline.
-
E.
associatedWithManager
Indicates that an entity has a managerial connection or relationship with a specific manager.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24d4862f881908cc8b89d3a78031d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:04 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24feef1b08190bb9525f71cce053e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ebe7b1c8190a6bfbf31dc7c7f07 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:11 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:09 a.m.