Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Ohio v. Clark | Statement: [Crawford v. Washington, subsequentCaseInterpreting, Ohio v. Clark]

Target entity: Ohio v. Clark
Context triple: [Crawford v. Washington, subsequentCaseInterpreting, Ohio v. Clark]

• A. Ohio v. Roberts
  Ohio v. Roberts is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court case that established a reliability-based framework for admitting hearsay evidence under the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause, later curtailed by Crawford v. Washington.
• B. Michigan v. Bryant
  Michigan v. Bryant is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the scope of the Confrontation Clause by clarifying when statements made to police are considered “testimonial” and thus subject to Sixth Amendment protections.
• C. Virginia v. Black
  Virginia v. Black is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a ban on cross burning carried out with intent to intimidate while clarifying the limits of First Amendment protection for hate speech and symbolic expression.
• D. Kentucky v. Dennison
  Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
• E. Jacobellis v. Ohio
  Jacobellis v. Ohio is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the constitutional standards for obscenity under the First Amendment, famously associated with Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” concurrence.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Ohio v. Clark
Triple: [Crawford v. Washington, subsequentCaseInterpreting, Ohio v. Clark]

Ohio v. Clark is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the limits of the Confrontation Clause in the context of statements made by child abuse victims to non-law-enforcement individuals.

Target entity: Ohio v. Clark
Target entity description: Ohio v. Clark is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the limits of the Confrontation Clause in the context of statements made by child abuse victims to non-law-enforcement individuals.

• A. Ohio v. Roberts
  Ohio v. Roberts is a landmark 1980 U.S. Supreme Court case that established a reliability-based framework for admitting hearsay evidence under the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause, later curtailed by Crawford v. Washington.
• B. Michigan v. Bryant
  Michigan v. Bryant is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the scope of the Confrontation Clause by clarifying when statements made to police are considered “testimonial” and thus subject to Sixth Amendment protections.
• C. Virginia v. Black
  Virginia v. Black is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a ban on cross burning carried out with intent to intimidate while clarifying the limits of First Amendment protection for hate speech and symbolic expression.
• D. Kentucky v. Dennison
  Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
• E. Jacobellis v. Ohio
  Jacobellis v. Ohio is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the constitutional standards for obscenity under the First Amendment, famously associated with Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” concurrence.
• F. None of above. chosen