Triple
T97570
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Empire State Realty Trust |
E1965
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityType |
P3487
|
FINISHED |
| Object | common stock |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: common stock | Statement: [Empire State Realty Trust, securityType, common stock]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityType Context triple: [Empire State Realty Trust, securityType, common stock]
-
A.
securityMechanism
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a means or method to protect another entity from threats, vulnerabilities, or unauthorized actions.
-
B.
securityFeature
Indicates that an entity provides, embodies, or is associated with a mechanism or property intended to enhance safety, protection, or defense against threats or vulnerabilities.
-
C.
security
Indicates that an entity provides protection, safety measures, or safeguards to another entity or against specific threats or risks.
-
D.
securityProgram
Indicates that an entity is associated with, participates in, or is governed by a security program, such as a set of policies, controls, or initiatives related to safety or protection.
-
E.
securedVariant
Indicates that one entity is a security-enhanced or more protected version of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24d4862f881908cc8b89d3a78031d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:04 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a24feef1b08190bb9525f71cce053e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24ebe7b1c8190a6bfbf31dc7c7f07 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:11 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a24f4b4658819087902414959161fb |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:09 a.m.