Triple
T975249
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yola language |
E21037
|
entity |
| Predicate | nameEtymologyLanguage |
P506
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English dialect of Wexford |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English dialect of Wexford | Statement: [Yola language, nameEtymologyLanguage, English dialect of Wexford]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: nameEtymologyLanguage Context triple: [Yola language, nameEtymologyLanguage, English dialect of Wexford]
-
A.
etymologyType
Indicates the specific kind or category of etymological relationship that links a term to its linguistic origin or source.
-
B.
etymologicalLanguage
chosen
Indicates the language from which a word or term is historically derived in its etymology.
-
C.
etymologyStatus
Indicates the status or reliability classification of an etymological explanation for a term or name.
-
D.
etymologyPossibleMeaning
Indicates a possible or hypothesized meaning that an etymological analysis suggests for a word or term.
-
E.
etymology
Indicates the historical origin and development of a word or term, including its source language and form.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493c2b62c8190b616351789ec47f8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b46234c88190b2bfc9cafe59d7f7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b2a6aa2c8190aebba71320ab678f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 9:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:40 p.m.