Triple
T9739027
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Independent Selection Commission |
E236138
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial appointments body |
C27192
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: judicial appointments body Context triple: [Independent Selection Commission, instanceOf, judicial appointments body]
-
A.
Judicial body
A judicial body is an official group or institution empowered by law to interpret and apply legal rules, resolve disputes, and administer justice.
-
B.
judicial office
A judicial office is an official position within the judiciary in which an individual is authorized to interpret and apply the law, preside over legal proceedings, and issue binding decisions.
-
C.
Judicial conference committee
A judicial conference committee is a group of judges and related officials convened to study, discuss, and recommend policies or rules to improve the administration and operation of the court system.
-
D.
quasi‑judicial body
A quasi-judicial body is an administrative or regulatory entity that has powers and procedures resembling those of a court, enabling it to interpret laws, conduct hearings, and make binding decisions or recommendations in specific areas of public or private disputes.
-
E.
judicial administrative office
A judicial administrative office is an organizational unit within the court system responsible for managing the non-judicial functions of the judiciary, such as case processing, records management, budgeting, staffing, and overall court operations support.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ca84d313e88190983ee6ffd0ef60d2 |
completed | March 30, 2026, 2:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 30, 2026, 8:22 p.m.