Triple

T95808
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Alps region E1926 entity
Predicate hasLanguageRegion P285 FINISHED
Object German-speaking areas LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German-speaking areas | Statement: [Alps region, hasLanguageRegion, German-speaking areas]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLanguageRegion
Context triple: [Alps region, hasLanguageRegion, German-speaking areas]
  • A. recognizedRegionalLanguage
    Indicates that a language holds officially recognized status within a specific region or subnational jurisdiction.
  • B. hasLanguageGroup
    Indicates that an entity belongs to, is associated with, or is categorized under a particular language group.
  • C. hasRegion chosen
    Indicates that an entity includes, contains, or is associated with a specific geographic or administrative region as part of its scope or structure.
  • D. languageBranch
    Indicates that one language belongs to, or is classified under, a broader linguistic branch or subgroup.
  • E. isWorldLanguage
    Indicates that a language is widely used across multiple countries or regions and serves as a common means of communication beyond its original native community.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a24d4862f881908cc8b89d3a78031d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:04 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a250cb400c8190b56343bbe19b48c7 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24ebd19c48190bab291fea0ecc0c2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:11 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:09 a.m.